This website requires JavaScript.

Allianz vince il premio tedesco per la Gestione delle Risorse Umane per il suo progetto di parità retributiva | Leggi l'articolo qui


People analytics as a tool to improve pay equity — a blog post for Trend Report

In a recent blog post for the German HR magazine Trend Report, PayAnalytics Co-founder Margrét Bjarnadóttir explained how important it is to recognize the limitation of AI-based HR tools when making important decisions about hiring, compensation, promotions, and training opportunities. Even when workplaces do strive for equity, their data can still reflect historical biases and discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, gender, and class. Hence, to improve pay equity, companies need to find the right tools, identify where there are potential biases, and take the necessary steps to eliminate those biases.

Margrét Bjarnadóttir - PayAnalytics co-founder

People analytics as a tool to improve pay equity

Wage inequality is a pressing issue that has been exacerbated by the pandemic. Millions of women have dropped out of the workforce and many people have changed jobs, either through internal moves or by switching employers. People analytics, the field that applies quantitative tools to the employee value chain, can support organizations in realizing pay equity and building more equitable workplaces. However, these tools require a thoughtful application, as even when workplaces do strive for equity, their data can still reflect historical biases and discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, gender, and class. Hence, to improve pay equity, companies need to find the right tools, identify where there are potential biases, and take the necessary steps to eliminate those biases. 

Recognizing the limitations of AI-based tools 

Today, AI-based people analytics tools are used to help managers measure productivity and make important decisions about hiring, compensation, promotions, and training opportunities. Many companies also use this technology to identify and close pay gaps related to gender, ethnicity, or other key demographic categories. As this use of AI in HR increases, however, it is important that its deployment and use are monitored to ensure that systems are robust, fair, and secure. These systems are only as good as the data and assumptions underlying them, so it is critical to ensure that the data is high-quality and reliable. Further, it is vital to understand the consequences and implications of the technology. Given the complexity and scale of the tasks usually delegated to AI, there is a real risk that models will go wrong. Without the necessary guidance and proper training, AI can churn out answers that lead to unknowingly biased decisions with potentially damaging consequences. 

This means that first, employers need to understand that data is not neutral and can contain bias. People analytics tools are generally built off an employer’s historical data on the recruiting, retention, promotion, and compensation of its employees. Such data captures the decisions and attitudes of the past. Managers must therefore remain aware that their retrospective data may reflect both old and current biases and may not fully help them address the complexities of people management in an increasingly diverse workforce. For instance, grades might be used as a proxy for intelligence, or occupational licenses or certificates may be taken as a measure of skills. However, these measures are incomplete and often contain biases and distortions. Thus, when applying any people analytics tool, it is important to consider the potential mismatches between what companies want to measure (e.g., intelligence or ability to learn) and what they actually measure (e.g., performance on scholastic tests). 

Additionally, companies need to understand that a people analytics tool’s performance is a product of both the data it is fed and the algorithm it uses. Hence, managers should consider that models are likely to perform best with individuals in majority demographic groups but worse with less well represented groups. This is because algorithms typically maximize overall accuracy, so performance for the majority population carries more weight than performance for the minority population in determining algorithm parameters. Also, there is no such thing as a truly “ethnicity-blind” or “gender-blind” model, and explicitly omitting ethnicity or gender from a model will not make the models “demographic neutral” – in fact, it can even make things worse. Moreover, if demographic categories are not evenly distributed throughout the organization, which is almost always the case, even carefully built models will not lead to equal outcomes across groups. Hence, to avoid making biased decisions, people in charge need to pay close attention to who is represented in the data, remain especially aware of the limitations of AI-based models, and monitor the models’ application across demographic groups. 

Detecting bias reliably with various tools

To ensure that they people analytics tools deliver useful beneficial decision support , organizations can use a variety of tools. One particularly helpful tool is a bias dashboard. A dashboard summarizes how the people analytics tool performs across different groups, allowing for early detection of potential bias. It highlights both statistical performance and the tool’s application impact across groups. For example, in a hiring support application, the dashboard can summarize the potential applicants “poked” on different sites (e.g., LinkedIn) as well as the proportion of each group that applied, received an interview and was ultimately hired.

In addition to monitoring statistical performance metrics, managers can also explicitly test for bias. For example, they can study how individual features, such as experience or training, contribute towards pay increases for different groups. They can also study the outcomes of the annual review process. For instance, if employees of one ethnicity are disproportionately recommended for a salary increase, this is a sign that the AI tool or the decision process may be biased. In this case, following the tool’s recommendations would reinforce the bias. It could also be that the tool is disproportionately identifying minorities as candidates for raises because they tend to be underpaid in the company, in which case the AI tool is helping the company solve the problem. 

It is important to remember that no model is complete. For example, an employee's interpersonal skills may influence their success within the company without necessarily showing up in the employee's HR data. The users of people analytics tools need to be aware of these additional factors and learn how to systematically include them in the decision making process. If there is quantifiable data related to these factors, they should consider collecting it. Also, any time an AI algorithm is used for decision making, the company needs to be able to explain to all stakeholders what that result means and how it was arrived at. Algorithms can help interpret past data and identify patterns, but people analytics is still an area where humans are central to decision making – so the final decisions, and the responsibility for these decisions, rest with the humans


People analytics tools, especially those based on AI, have become indispensable in modern HR; however, quantitative models are intended to assist, not replace, human judgment, companies must remain aware of machine learning biases and model limitations. To get the most out of AI and other people analytics tools, companies will need to consistently monitor how the application is working in real time, what explicit and implicit criteria are being used to train the tool, and whether the outcomes of the tool’s recommended decisions affect different groups differently in unintended ways. In order to harness people analytics appropriately and create truly equitable workplaces, managers must learn to ask the right questions about their data, their decisions, their quantitative models, and their software.

Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter via e-mail
Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter via e-mail

Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter via e-mail

PayAnalytics' reporting for Canada's Pay Equity Act

At PayAnalytics, we often talk about equal pay for work of equal value. Canada’s Pay Equity Act, implemented August 2021, takes a unique approach to achieving this objective. Typically, pay equity requirements focus on how men and women doing similar jobs are paid, but Canada now focuses on the value of the job to the employer.

Il progetto di parità retributiva di Allianz vince il premio tedesco per la Gestione delle Risorse Umane

All’inizio di settembre sono stati assegnati a Colonia i premi tedeschi per la Gestione delle Risorse Umane 2022 (Personalwirtschaftspreis). Allianz, una compagnia assicurativa globale con sede in Germania, ha vinto il primo premio nella categoria HR Tech e Digital per il suo approccio alla riduzione del divario retributivo a livello globale. Questo progetto garantisce la parità di retribuzione per oltre 100.000 dipendenti in più di 70 paesi, il che significa che presso le compagnie assicurative Allianz donne e uomini sono pagati allo stesso modo per uno stesso lavoro o per un lavoro di pari valore.

Using technology to achieve pay equity

Using technology to achieve pay equity

"With the right tools, supported with the right data, we can bring about workplace transformation and pay equity."

In the latest issue of Dynamic Magazine, our founder Margrét shares valuable insights for leaders using data analytics or AI on their pay equity journeys.

The Nordic DEI Paradox - Not so Paradoxical?

Margret, our co-founder, Dr. Marie Louise Sunde, Founder and CEO of Equality Check, and Tuula Rytila, Corporate Vice President at Microsoft Digital Stores had an inspiring discussion on a panel on gender equity at the Nordic Innovation Summit two weeks ago. The panel was called "The Scandinavian DEI Paradox—Not So Paradoxical?" referring to the fact that while the Nordics consistently score at the top of every equality scale, women are still underrepresented on boards and in top management.

California strengthens its pay equity requirements

California, the first U.S. state to pass a law on pay data reporting, is considering proposed legislation taking the requirements of the original bill even further. Senate Bill 973 on pay equity was passed in September 2020 and requires large employers to provide data on employees by race, ethnicity, and sex in the ten job categories and pay ranges used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The first data reports were submitted to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) in March 2021.

VÍS — Working towards gender equality
Storia di successo dei clienti

VÍS — Working towards gender equality

VÍS, the largest insurance company in Iceland, offers comprehensive insurance solutions in the consumer and corporate sectors. They have close to 200 employees, mainly in Reykjavik and in different field offices around the country.

Legge sulla parità retributiva in Italia: cosa prevede e cosa comporta per le aziende italiane

Il 3 dicembre 2021 l'Italia ha firmato una nuova legge sulla parità retributiva (Legge 162/2021) che mira ad affrontare il divario retributivo tra uomini e donne e a incoraggiare la partecipazione delle donne al mercato del lavoro. La legge introduce alcune importanti modifiche al Codice delle Pari Opportunità (D.Lgs. 198/2006), il quale vieta qualsiasi discriminazione retributiva, diretta ed indiretta, per uno stesso lavoro o un lavoro al quale è attribuito pari valore. La nuova legge, incentrata su trasparenza e premi, è in linea con il Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e di Resilienza (PNRR), il quali contiene, tra le altre cose, una Strategia Nazionale per la parità di genere 2021-2026.

How to use use People Analytics to Build an Equitable Workplace

Harvard Business Review just published this article, which is written by two of PayAnalytics' founders, Professors Margrét Bjarnadóttir and David Anderson, along with Professor David Gaddis Ross. It discusses how automation is changing HR and what we need to be aware of when applying Automation and AI in People Analytics.

Can Pay Gap Analysis be the driver of equal opportunities in the workplace?

The unjustified pay gap between men and women is still present, and it seems that it will not go away without some focused efforts. Although countless studies and reports show that the gap is there, many still do not believe it impacts their own organisation. The EU Commission is increasingly communicating that the issue must be addressed. Some countries have begun the journey and have insights to share. Data analysis to determine the gap and structured implementation of measures to close the gap is increasingly used.

Dr Margrét Vilborg Bjarnadóttir will participate in this important event on the 29 June.

California Pay Data Reporting

California Pay Data Reporting

California Pay Data Reporting (SB 973) requires large employers to report pay and specific other data to the DFEH (Department of Fair Employment and Housing) by March 31, 2021, and annually after that.

Entrega de los premios Universal Fair Pay Check

El 17 de marzo, las empresas recibirán un galardón en base al certificado de igualdad retributiva Universal Fair Pay Check. Este certificado internacional mide, de forma coordinada, el cumplimiento de la igualdad retributiva entre las empresas de diferentes países.

Companies in Spain are now obligated to take action to ensure equal pay for work of equal value

Companies in Spain are now obligated to take action to ensure equal pay for work of equal value. DireACTIVAS, one of our partners in Spain, wrote an article (in Spanish) on the new legislation and the potential impact it will have on equality in Spain. We are happy to assist Spanish companies in fulfilling the requirements of the new legislation - and our solution is of course also in Spanish!

Margrét Bjarnadóttir will participate in a Reykjavik Global Forum 2020 digital session

Come and join us virtually for a conversation about equal pay: the fast changing legislation around the world, the role of analysis and data driven decision support, the equal pay journey and key levers to drive change - all packed into 90 minutes.

Margrét Bjarnadóttir from PayAnalytics will participate in a Reykjavik Global Forum 2020 digital session on Wednesday 11th November 09:30 UTC.

The name of the event is A Fair Diagnosis: It’s time to close the wage gap - FPI Lab and you can register using the registration link below.

Margret Bjarnadottir wrote for Ms. Magazine: We're Not Waiting 200 Years to Close the Gender Pay Gap

The World Economic Forum estimates that it will take over 200 years to close the gender pay gap. No one should have the patience to wait that long. How can we accelerate change? The answer may lay in data and models with a good dose of transparency.

The journey starts with gathering the data and understanding the pay structure. Then companies move on to identifying areas for improvement and eliminating unexplained demographic pay gaps through corrective action—in other words, ensuring equal pay for equal work.

42% of organizations are planning for pay equity adjustments in 2020

42% of organizations are planning for pay equity adjustments in 2020 according to the recently published @WorldatWork 2019-2020 Salary Budget Survey. Is yours one of them? PayAnalytics can help. Our customers use PayAnalytics to assist them in every step on the way towards a transparent and fair pay structure. Our software solution recommends individual raises to close the gap, quickly detects outliers, gives an overview of the cost to help with the budgeting, and so much more.

Addressing Demographic Pay Gaps with Data-driven Solutions | guest feature for insideBIGDATA

Dr. Margret Bjarnadottir (@mvilborg2) from @payanalytics recently wrote a guest feature for @insideBigData about addressing demographic #PayGaps with Data-driven Solutions.

Demographic pay gaps, including the gender pay gap, are the result of more complex factors than just a desire to minimize payroll expenses. They stem from unconscious biases and processes that are better suited to one group compared to another. And, as multiple executives have found out, good intentions and “mindfulness” are not enough to eliminate the gaps.

Why Companies' Attempts to Close the Gender Pay Gap Often Fail

PayAnalytics co-founders David Anderson and Margrét V. Bjarnadóttir wrote an article together with Cristian Dezso and David Gaddis Ross for Harvard Business Review about closing the gender pay gap.

Gender pay equity has become a big point of contention at many companies. Not only have politicians and other public figures spoken out against the gender pay gap, but there has also been a rising tide of high profile lawsuits targeting major employers, most notably in the U.S., with all the bad publicity and financial liability they entail.